The article "Neuroscience in Court: Your Behavior on Trial" by Suzanne Podolski explores the increasing role of neuroscience in legal settings, emphasizing its impact on both criminal and civil cases. It highlights how neuroscientific evidence is used to assess defendants' mental states, potentially mitigating sentences or influencing judgments on competence. The article presents various cases where brain injuries or abnormalities played a critical role in court decisions, illustrating the complex interplay between neurological conditions and legal responsibility. The growing need for neurotherapists as expert witnesses is discussed, along with the challenges and ethical considerations of interpreting and presenting neuroscientific data in the courtroom. The article argues for a nuanced understanding of human behavior, considering both biological and environmental factors, to achieve just legal outcomes.

  • Understand the role of neuroscience in legal proceedings and its implications for determining criminal responsibility and competence.

  • Analyze how brain injuries and abnormalities can influence behavior and legal judgments in court cases.

  • Evaluate the ethical considerations and challenges of using neuroscientific evidence in the courtroom.

  • Recognize the importance of expert testimony by neurotherapists and the qualifications required for effective courtroom contributions.

  • Examine specific legal cases where neuroscientific evidence impacted the outcomes, noting both successes and limitations.

  • Appreciate the evolving relationship between neuroscience and the law, and the potential future developments in this interdisciplinary field.

Content

    1. Neuroscience in Court: Your Behavior on Trial

    2. Copy of Neuroscience in Court Quiz