Logical Paradox: A Further Study in Left Hemisphere Capture

This article explores the paradoxes inherent in the way the left and right hemispheres of the brain perceive reality. Drawing from Iain McGilchrist's work The Matter With Things, the article delves into how the left hemisphere's analytical, linear, and decontextualized approach can lead to paradoxes that baffle logic, such as Zeno's paradoxes and the Quine-Duhem and Sceptical paradoxes. These paradoxes arise because the left hemisphere struggles with concepts like degrees of truth, context, and the continuum of time, which are better handled by the right hemisphere's more holistic and intuitive perspective. The article argues that an over-reliance on left-hemisphere thinking can lead to rigid, inflexible, and often illogical worldviews that overlook the complexity and fluidity of reality.

  • Understand the differences in perception and processing between the left and right hemispheres of the brain.

  • Explore how the left hemisphere's linear and decontextualized approach leads to logical paradoxes.

  • Analyze specific paradoxes such as Zeno's Paradoxes, the Quine-Duhem Paradox, and the Sceptical Paradox, in the context of hemispheric thinking.

  • Recognize the limitations of left-hemisphere dominance in understanding concepts like degrees of truth, context, and the passage of time.

  • Discuss the implications of left-hemisphere thinking on real-world decision-making and its potential to create rigid and illogical frameworks.

  • Reflect on the need to balance left-hemisphere logic with right-hemisphere intuition to achieve a more holistic understanding of reality.

Become a Member