Large Language Models and Psychotherapy (2.5hrs)
LLMs & Psychotherapy - a look at the 2026 literature.
Learning Orientation
What exactly is an LLM doing? Understanding the Machine
The Black Box
Why does this matter in psychotherapy?
Quiz
At a Glance
Setting the Scene
What Does the 2026 Evidence Actually Show?
The Strongest Positive Trial Signals
What Do the Meta-Analyses Add?
Quiz
Augmentation Rather Than Replacement
Safety
Why 'Helpful' Is Not the Same as 'Therapeutic'
User Experience, Alliance and Boundaries
What Do Psychotherapists and the Public Think?
Quiz
Useful for certain types of supportive tasks
A Clinical Reading of the Evidence
Questions for Further Clinical Discussion
Conclusion
Quiz
References
This reading course examines what the emerging 2026 research tells us about the use of LLMs and conversational AI in psychotherapy. The course considers what these systems can currently do, where the evidence is strongest, and where significant clinical and safety concerns remain. It provides psychotherapists with a practical framework for distinguishing between appropriate AI augmentation, functions requiring human supervision, and aspects of psychotherapy that should not yet be delegated to autonomous systems.
Explain the fundamental nature of large language models, including how their operation differs from human cognition and why they remain partly a “black box.”
Distinguish between conversational fluency and clinical competence, including the limitations of using apparent empathy, reasoning or therapeutic language as evidence of genuine understanding.
Interpret the emerging 2026 evidence concerning the effectiveness of LLM-based interventions, particularly in structured, CBT-like, depression- and anxiety-focused applications.
Identify appropriate roles for AI augmentation, including therapist support, psychoeducation, between-session assistance, training, drafting, coding and other structured tasks.
Recognise important clinical and ethical risks, including hallucination, over-trust, dependency, cultural limitations, privacy concerns, crisis-management failures and inadequate human oversight.
Apply a clinically informed framework for evaluating AI use in psychotherapy, distinguishing tasks that may be safely augmented from those requiring human judgement, supervision, accountability and therapeutic responsibility.